100 Miles Per Gallon? That's So "1992"

According to a new survey by JD Power andThe short answer to this question is simple: While the
Associates, approximately one third of consumers inU.S. continues to sell its traditional vehicles, other
the United States consider fuel economy to be a keyvehicles are being bought and sold far from America,
factor when purchasing a new car. With fuel economy,by the same companies.
dependence on foreign oil, pollution, and global warmingVehicles that can attain over 70 miles per gallon have
weighing heavy on the minds of so many peoplebeen sold in Europe and Japan for many years.
recently, it may be a surprise to learn that in 1992,Recently, Volkswagen produced a vehicle called the
General Motors actually produced a vehicle that"Lupo" that is a perfect example. This vehicle, which
achieved 100 miles per gallon (MPG).achieves 78 miles per gallon, likely will never be sold in
In order to get a better idea of what General Motorsthe USA. For the 2007 model year, Honda has
has been doing for the last 25 years, it is important tointroduced the Fit to the US Market (known in other
first learn about another amazing vehicle: The GMparts of the world as the "Jazz"). In Japan, the Jazz
TPC. The TPC (which stands for "Two Personcomes standard with a smaller engine and a few
Commuter") was able to obtain 75 miles-per-gallon. Itfresh ideas to help boost fuel economy. In the USA,
weighed approximately 1000 pounds and resembled athe Fit doesn't have the smaller engine and isn't even
Geo Metro. GM abandoned the project vehicle, whichan option.
contained a frugal 3-cylinder engine, when they neededAmericans have always loved big cars, or at least
to add another 200 pounds of reinforcement. Thisthat's what they tell us. They, of course, are the auto
unfortunate turn of events can be blamed on GM'smanufacturers. This has nothing to do with conspiracy
need to comply with America's then lax safety laws.theories and everything to do with economics. When
While the existence of such a vehicle may beGeneral Motors sells a giant truck or SUV, they make
shocking to some, what is even more shocking is thea lot of money. When they sell a small two-person
existence of other prototypes made by Generalcommuter, they make next-to-nothing. As a
Motors that met the same demise. These vehiclesconsequence of this realization, all that was needed
included the GM Lean Machine (80 MPG) in 1982, alonghave been broadcasts of a few finely focused
with a number of other fuel efficient vehicles like thecommercials to the citizens of the richest country in
GM Aero-X, the GM Aero 2000, and the finally thethe world. Manufacturers have persuaded the citizenry
GM Ultralite (which had achieved 100 miles-per-gallon).that they absolutely need these "Tanks on Wheels".
While Honda was leading the world with the Civic VXProfits skyrocket. To remind Americans that there are
in 1992 (achieving 50 miles-per-gallon) the USA- ownedno options, merely look at the fact that the options
General Motors was producing 100 MPG vehiclesheave never been presented.
behind the scenes, all the while selling 20 MPG vehiclesGeneral Motors had the chance to be the world leader
to the public.in fuel economy, which it turned down to be the world
100 miles per gallon is not only obtainable, but it alreadyleader in SUVs. GM is not alone, as every other auto
has been obtained.manufacturer has produced similar vehicles over the
One obvious question must be asked. Why are theselast 25 years and denied the U.S. access to them.
high gas mileage vehicles not available for sale? WhyAmericans should not only ask how they can get
do companies like General Motors, Honda, Toyota, andbetter gas mileage, but most importantly ask why they
Ford continue to sell 30 MPG vehicles when somethinghave never been given that option in the first place. In
so much better was made before? The answer toa world where wars are waged over oil, more options
that question is, of course, a complex one. Marketshould be offered to a concerned public. Perhaps
analyses, surveys, polls, government regulations, andblowing the dust off of 25 year old blue prints is a
other red tape held back efficiency.good place to start.